Examine This Report on case law on section 395 ppc convictions

Courts prioritize fairness and copyright fundamental rights though respecting the autonomy of educational institutions. On the aforesaid proposition, we're guided through the decision of the Supreme Court while in the case of Khyber Medical University and others v. Aimal Khan and others, PLD 2022 Supreme Court ninety two. 9. The aforesaid exceptions are missing from the present case. In these circumstances, this petition is found to be not maintainable and is dismissed accordingly with pending application (s). Read more

93 . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming into the main case, It is usually a effectively-set up proposition of regulation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence while in the Stricto-Sensu, utilize to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion acquire support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of your charge, however, that is topic for the procedure provided under the relevant rules and never otherwise, to the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-take pleasure in the evidence and to reach at its independent findings about the evidence.

These lists are sorted chronologically by Chief Justice and involve all notable cases decided from the court. Articles exist for almost all cases.

The former means “guilty act” and also the latter means “guilty mind.” With the omission on the intention, the commission with the act alone is just not more than enough to gain a conviction for that crime. This is really a primary principle that all regulation students are very well acquainted with.

The Pakistan Penal Code (PPC) is an extensive piece of legislation that defines a variety of criminal offenses and prescribes corresponding punishments for all those found guilty.

In this blog site post, we will delve into the details of Section 302 PPC, Checking out its provisions along with the gravity of its punishment.

In this case, the Supreme Court of Pakistan upheld the death penalty for that accused who intentionally murdered the victim.

Binding Precedent – A rule or principle set up by a court, which other courts are obligated to follow.

The legislation as recognized in previous court rulings; like common regulation, which springs from judicial decisions and tradition.

Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 8180/2019 (D.B.) Saif Shujaat and Ors V/S Govt. of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-223999 Tag:Given the legal analysis on the subject issue, we've been of the view that the claim of your petitioners for retroactive regularization from their First contract appointment and promotion thereon, from that angle is not legally seem, Aside from promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, They are really subject matter to rules and regulations here When the recruitment rules of the topic post allow the case from the petitioners for promotion could possibly be considered, however, we're crystal clear in our point of view that contractual service cannot be viewed as for seniority and promotion because the seniority is reckoned from the date of normal appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum fitness, subject matter to availability of vacancy subject on the approval of your competent authority.

The scrupulous reader may have noticed some thing over: a flaw. Over and above the first seven words, the definition focuses within the intention to cause “Injury,” not the intention to cause death. The 2 primary elements that must be proven in order to convict a person of the crime are “

Regardless of its popularity, very few might be aware of its intricacies. This article can be an attempt to highlight the flaws of this section plus the incredibly lower threshold that governs it.

Persuasive Authority – Prior court rulings that can be consulted in deciding a current case. It may be used to guide the court, but is not binding precedent.

one hundred fifteen . Const. P. 6025/2024 (D.B.) Dr. Pritam Das V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi As far as the stance in the respondents that pensionary benefits may very well be withheld on account of your allegations leveled against the petitioner, in our view, section 20 with the Sindh Civil Servants Act of 1973 deals with the pension and gratuity that civil servants are entitled to. However, the act does present for certain circumstances under which a civil servant's pension could be withheld or reduced. These incorporate if a civil servant is found guilty of misconduct or negligence during their service, their pension may be withheld or reduced. If a civil servant is convicted of a serious crime, their pension can be withheld or reduced. In some cases, a civil servant's pension could possibly be withheld or reduced if he/she fails to comply with certain conditions established from the government.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *